What does the EU referendum mean for students?







  • Terminology
The news headlines have been dominated by coverage of the EU referendum, but there appears to be inconsistency over which terms people are using in order to state where they stand on the debate. So for the record:

Brexit (Britain Exit), Leave, Out, No = LEAVE THE EU
Bremain (Britain Remain), Stay, In, Yes = STAY IN THE EU

  • What is the EU
- The EU is a collection of 28 countries, which, through various treaties and committees, was forged out of the 2nd world war in order to reduce the threat of war and to reinforce democracy. Since then it has enabled the freedom of movement between member states, made trading easier and overseen the development of common foreign security policy. We have been a member of the EU since 1973.

  • Why are we having a referendum
- In last year's general election, as part of the conservative manifesto, David Cameron promised an in/out referendum by the end of 2017. The plan was to kill 2 birds with one stone: Nigel Farage’s UKIP posed a real threat to the conservative party's share of the vote, and many Tory MPs themselves were eurosceptic, a thorn in the side of the potential Conservative Party leaders. By promising a referendum on EU membership, the Conservatives were guaranteed more votes.


  • 3 Reasons why people want to leave
  1. 1. Immigration
    People are arguing that we would regain control of our borders. They argue that attempts to control immigration into the UK will fail as long as we are in the EU. This is the presiding argument for the Brexit campaign in light of the recent refugee crisis and threat from ISIS.
  2. 2. EU Membership Fees
    People are quick to point out that membership costs around £20 billion per year, and that we don't receive anywhere near what we put in. Brexit campaigners argue that we could arrange a trade deal with the EU without having to be a member (like Switzerland or Norway) so that Trade wouldn't be affected.
  3. 3. Legal Quandry
    People get frustrated that the laws made by the directly-elected European Parliament supersede legislation made by individual member state parliaments.

  • 3 reasons why people want to stay

  1. 1. Jobs
    Millions of UK jobs are linked to EU membership. Whilst it's incorrect to say that these jobs depend on our membership to the EU, the repercussions that a Brexit might have on job security are unknown and therefore, still at risk.
  2. 2. Trade
    Remain campaigners argue that the EU is Britain's main trading partner, consisting of 52% of the total trade in goods and services. They state that if we are to leave the EU, trade would suffer considerably. The argument is that if we are to negotiate a trade agreement after exiting, the terms and conditions would be dictated by the EU alone, and we wouldn't have a say in it. Not to mention the creation of a trade agreement could take several years.
  3. 3. Travel and Work
    As a member of the EU, we as UK citizens have the right to work abroad without a work permit, live abroad for that purpose, stay there after employment has ended, and not to mention not needing a visa to go on holiday to Europe! (Inter-railing has never been easier...)

  • The deal
- In light of the EU debate, Despite Cameron siding with the 'remain' campaign, the Prime Minister has recognised the issues surrounding the UK's EU membership, and has sought to renegotiate its terms and conditions should we remain part of it. Below are just 3 main points that David Cameron has secured:

  1. 1. Welfare Benefits for Migrants
    Cameron half secured his plan for a 4-year "emergency brake" on in-work benefits for migrants, but new arrivals will have their tax credits phased in over four years. This 'emergency break' can be implemented if migration reaches exceptional levels, but must be removed within 7 years without question. Instead of a complete ban on child benefit for migrant workers' children who live overseas, the child benefit payment will reflect the cost of living in their home countries.
  2. 2. Competitive Trade
    David Cameron managed to secure the assurance from the EU that they would continue to enhance competitiveness of the single market to improve trade through the reduction of administrative fees and burdens.
  3. 3. Protection for Non Euro-Zone Countries
    Cameron has secured the right for single member countries to raise objections at EU council, especially for decisions that could directly affect the City of London. The deal also reserves the right for the UK to not be obliged to fund euro bail outs.

  • Why students should be voting IN
This is arguably one of the most pivotal political decisions to occur in our lifetime, potentially more so than who the next prime minister will be. Exiting the EU has the possibility to drastically change the UK's political, economic and social landscape. It is therefore CRAZY important for us as studentsto get educated on this debate and make our voices heard, considering there are nearly 2.5 million students in the uk. So here are 3 reasons why you, as a student, (assuming you are a student), should vote to remain in the EU.

  1. 1. Research and Higher Education Funding
    Currently, funding from the EU provides an extra 15% on top of the science and research budget in the UK government. This research funding significantly helps the advancement of STEM research in particular, allowing the development of scientific knowledge that is so crucial to education and to society. A Brexit would mean that any funding arrangements made between the UK and the EU would again be at the discretion of member states - we would have very little influence.
  2. 2. Networking
    The research funding advantage links heavily to the networking that is made possible through our EU membership. International collaboration is crucial to this research, allowing the combination of equipment, facilities and expertise to maximise the productivity and progression of scientific research. EU membership ensures the mobility of researchers across Europe to do this. Considering the UK has consistently been ranked in the top 5 countries in the world for University-Industry collaboration in research and development, a Brexit could endanger this drastically.
  3. 3. Erasmus Schemes and International Students
    1/3 of the student body at the University of Bath are international students. There are 125,000 EU students at British Universities, and 14% of academic staff come from other EU member states. They generate over £2.2 billion for the economy and create approximately 19,000 jobs. The Erasmus Scheme, which allows and helps fund any student in the EU to study abroad without visas/permits as part of their university education, would be in danger in the event of a Brexit. Since its conception in 1987, 200,000 students and 20,000 academics have taken part in the exchange scheme, allowing them to build international networks and absorb different cultures to enrich their academic experience.


The evidence then, appears to suggest that EU membership has an overwhelmingly positive impact on university students, contributing to scientific research, enriched study experiences and the maintenance of the global reputation that many UK universities have.



If you wish to go away and look further into this debate, then please do, as I have only given a brief overview of the arguments being formed in this debate. But I do urge you all, as students we have a huge influence in this referendum. So read up, and on the 23rd of june, get out to your respective polling stations and make a difference.

Comments

  1. Brilliant analysis, and clear statement of the facts, as always - YASSSS EVEEE!! :D

    I would like to just say briefly that, whilst the majority of Euroskeptics and the arguments they make are right-wing based on the points you made above, there are some reasons why liberals and left-wingers would want out too: they suspect that the EU (in particular the Commission, rather than the Parliament) has become beholden to vested corporate and financial interests. Example: the Transatlantic Trade ad Investment Partnership (TTIP) - potentially the power to grant multinational corporations incredible, and unaccountable powers at the expense of democratically elected governments, with the not-so-far-fetched potential even to force privatisation or the abandonment of environmental regulations etc.; essentially entrenching the shitty anglo-american ultra-free-market system at the expense of social welfare states and collective concerns... (more info here: http://anotherangryvoice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/ttip-biggest-threat-uk-sovereignty.html
    http://www.theguardian.com/business/ttip
    http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/22/ttip-deal-real-serious-risk-nhs-leading-qc
    ), some REALLY scary stuff. Another thing that rattled a load of people was the whole Greek saga, where the 'Troika' of European and International institutions (European Commission/Council, the European Central Bank, and the IMF) deliberately brought the Greek economy to the edge of bankruptcy, rejecting any and all extremely reasonable compromises offered by the Greek government (recently elected on a landslide specifically to do so) in order to maintain a poisonous and destructive austerity regime that has, far from helping the greek economy, proved utterly disastrous, literally caused a humanitarian disaster, and directly led/is leading to the rise of fascism again (Golden dawn). That kind of bullying of smaller nations into following economic diktats against the will of their people horrified a lot of people, and deeply shook my own faith in the EU.

    However. Whereas I am no longer the unequivocal Europhile I used to be - anyone can see that there is a LOT than needs to change - it's important to recognise that just jumping out like a spoilt toddler when the going gets tough and you don't get exactly what you want everytime is no way for a nation to behave. Staying in and working constructively to fix the problems together is the mature thing to do. (Against all odds...) I still have some faith in democratic collectivism; that we achieve more together than we do on our own, and for that reason I would say we have to stay. Besides the fact that under our current government is all for (despite harping on about sovereignty) TTIP, and would probably sign it even if we left, not to mention jumping with glee at the chance to slash and burn all the worker- and social-protection laws/treaties that we are party to as an EU member state, it's a question of ideals and the future. Do we want to be an introspective, ever-more individualist, increasingly corporate isolationist island drifting off into the atlantic ocean, our international influence reduced etc.? Or do we want to be an involved, active member of a continent-wide partnership of our closest friends and neighbours; a part of a 500 million-strong unity to match up to the likes of the US, China, and Russia; an internationalist, cosmopolitan force for real change in the world?

    I know which one I prefer. And despite my doubts, I shall not let my future be decided by the barely-masked racism and xenophobia of a scare-mongering, self-interested élite and be lumped in with frankly ignorant people who see no benefit of looking past their front door.

    (/rant)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Baaer Meinhof and Baby Killers...

'Students' VS 'Residents' - Bath is full to the brim

Evolutionary Explanations of Food Preference - Revision/Essay